IMO any log that involves the same player getting bloodlust more than once should be disqualified, or just moved into a separate category.
Removed
Hello. I understand that you want to present the information in more digestible manner. However would it not make more sense to actually exclude the top outliers instead of including only them? What about showing data from the 80%-95% range instead?
Druid dps (cat) in Gruuls Lair is likely understated since a guild may take a feral druid talented towards being guardian into Maulgar and get the same druid to dps in the Gruul fight.Same with tanking the channellers in the Magtheridon encounter. Further analysis into talent selection is required to have effective cat dps representation.
Including Heroism/Bloodlust swapping into the data just cheeses the fun out of comparing parses and working to improve your character tbh. I'll still be looking through them to fix errors in my own play, but looking at parses above ~95 will be useless because all of the data is tainted by lust uptime.While aggregating data like this can be useful, I don't think high individual parses are going to mean much throughout this expansion under the current ruleset.
I love that you post these, makes it so much easier to find a group as Feral DPS.