Analysis = Posting data without discussing it in any way?
Had the same exact thought...
I like wowhead, so im here to voluntarily add a comment and hopefully help out wowhead's algorithms!
This seems to be the direction the site is headed. Been a lot of posts lately with either no valuable information, reposting sections of other posts as a new post, posting out of date information, or hastily written articles that are inaccurate. I'm sure these comments about it will be deleted in short order though.
So is this the statistics for the best PI classes, or is this statistic without? I for one would like to see the top ranked statistics without PI.
How do i report a post/analysis/statistic as incorrect?
I did not find much of an analysis here, so could it be that it is unfinished?When reporting data, it is generally not recommended to just dump numbers. I suggest writing the section including new data by taking inspiration from the format of result sections in scientific reports. The following is the form I learned from a writing course, and I find this very useful. In general, I write a section like the following for each figure or table of data: To , we . We found that . . . This suggests .
@Anshlun: potentially very interesting article, but the title can be misleading. I would either a) change the word Analysis with Reporting in the title or b) add an analysis section to the body of the article
So bad content. It's a shame senseless posts like this one get posted here. It seems that u guys at wowhead dont read your own articles or dont have any claim to quatliy.
jep this has been going on for a while now, wowhead falling from grace :'(
Anshlun, who's your editor at wowhead? I'd suggest getting with Alexis or Sara if you're having issues providing a well written and presented article. I know this isn't the New York Times, but taking care of what you post for others to enjoy reading and gage their views on their own characters and those in their guild raids does go a long way. Thank-you and I look forward reading your next article.
no screw that if they want to list dps charts but.. literally everyone hates warcraft logs and having to play for dmg, or not being able to play because of fotmyet these articles promote it
yes, posting this absent context is useless nonsense, but it's nothing new, wowhead is exactly as good and as awful as ever. Some stuff is great, some stuff is clickbait nonsense. A tale as old as time. My question is...Why are 17 thousand people playing BM hunter if it's terrible? I know the rankings are jank and classes are more or less valuable then they appear here. But this seems like a big outlier even in messy data. Do BM hunters have some big niche or utility in the raid I don't know about?
Great. DK's are officially the worst class in the game. They suck at raiding, they suck at arena, they suck in m+ and they've sucked throughout the whole expansion. The only reason people brought dks in CN was because of the AMZ.And inb4 someone says "Dks aren't that bad!". Even if they're not "that bad", every other class is still better so it makes no difference. A car with 3 wheels is not as bad as a car with no wheels but if you could pick between a car with 3 wheels and a car with 4 wheels, you'd take the one with 4 wheels. They better buff DKs in 9.2 to the point where they heal more than healers, randomly one shots people in arena, have 25 invulnerabilities/immunities that last forever, 50 teleports/dashes and increase their damage done outside cooldowns by 500% so they're more in line with the other classes.
It's been a full year now with BM at the bottom. Still topping the meters. Still don't care.
3 dps spec warlock KEKW
I'm stoked that my Enhancement Shaman main has remained consistent for Shadowlands.... #BintierThat said, I'm surprised how many people are sticking with it! It's a fun spec to play, but crazy to see 6k compared to all those higher specs tbh.
Enhance shaman just too OP