A void entitiy taking a visage that happens to be female is no stranger than Chromie imo.At the end of the day its just gonna prompt more rage about the fact that some games include genderless robots and we are harming the perception of male/female roles in socity or similar BS.There are so many more things to be annoyed about, like where is my 900 mount achievement.
I think this crowd obsessing over gender due to a laughably basic misunderstanding of reading the text and not knowing the lore need to get outside. :) Like, it's so obviously the incorrect reading of it that you'd have to be doing so for an ulterior motive. I mean, Xal'atath didn't even have blood at that point in time, so how could it be 'her' blood?Zan'do sacrificed his followers for power. THEIR blood exchanged for HIS power, at least until Kith'ix woke up and killed him.
Interersting. Never having played a priest I had no idea who these spirits were.
Neat. Woulda been cool if you did the questline as a priest with the shadow artifact in your bags, an NPC that's a copy of the player would be there.
love the attention to small details in the world.
It seems like every time there's a particularly good wowhead Article and I check the Author it's always "DISCORDIANKITTY".I have no idea who DISCORDIANKITTY really is, like how I've seen Squishei on Podcasts, and maybe DISCO-KITTY is just a lot better at coaxing good writing out of ChatGPT...But if you actually write all your Articles, DISCO-KITTY, you're doing a great job and I consider you the only "Real" Author on the Wowhead Team.At least, your Articles are the only ones that seem to have proper original Content that isn't just a Copy/Paste or Low-Effort Typo-Riddled Posts.May you Catwalk many Disco's.
As a shadow priest that played Legion, I was hoping for the final imprint to be me. After all, Spriests that played the campaign are actually the latest wielder of Xal.
"No, the latest true wielder was queen Azshara in Battle for Azeroth."Nah, Xal'atath wasn't in the blade anymore when Azshara got it.