Additional deck slots should primarily be a design issue, as I can't imagine it's one of programming, or data storage.
More deck slots! YES!
Argent Horserider is just too weak. 3 mana to kill a 3/2 and keep a 2/1 on the board isn't a bad deal, but most decks will be running efficient removal anyway and would rather not spend turn 3 playing a card that just wilts to anything that costs 3 mana or more, as well as 2/3s for 2 (or Zombie Chow). Hell, it even dies to Northshire/Voidwalker.In arena, mid to low pick. Potential card advantage while putting a little extra on the board is nice, but faces the same issues as constructed.
This card would be amazing at 2 mana, but at 3 it just isn't that great. It still counters cards like Mad Scientist and Knife Juggler perfectly though, which may be enough to make it viable for lower tier players, but I can't imagine it being played in competitive play at all. The more exciting thing about this card is the news that comes with it though. Yay more deck slots!
Not every card needs to be competitive, and we still have dozens of cards to be revealed. I, for one, am happy that they are filling some slots for arena variety and to give options to new players who have few cards. This is an with half the stats and half the cost. I can imagine a low budget aggro paladin running this, for instance.
Why dosen't anyone ask for card limit increase. With all the cards we are gonna have a 30 card limit seems very constricting.
Too bad the card might not be that great, because the art shows my favorite mount in WoW, Argent Charger!
except blue gill has a gigher purpose in murloc and zoo decks.ie no one plays him exceot in those 2 decks.. isnt there already a 3/1 with charge minus shield.. please stop reveaking garbage cards fcol
More deck slots, about time!
more deck slots finally!>.. been waiting since the beginning of heartstone for this.